![]() A 175-pound person would burn nearly 400 calories during that same 30-minute run. “When you look at the literature, running tends to burn more calories than other modalities,” he says.Īccording to an online calorie estimator from the American Council on Exercise, a 115-pound person running for 30 minutes at a slow-to-moderate pace (a 10-minute mile) would burn about 260 calories: the same amount people who did CrossFit typically torched in 20 minutes, according to the research. And when it comes to vigorous, calorie-burning exercises that people are comfortable doing for extended periods of time, running usually comes out on top. He says a “more fair” way to assess an exercise’s true energy demands is to ask people to do it at a pace that is comfortable for them. But in the real world, Porcari says, many people won’t be comfortable (or capable of) engaging in regular or extended bouts of high-intensity training. ![]() So if you’re extremely short on time, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is probably your best option. ![]() “You can crank like the dickens for 30 seconds and burn a lot of calories,” he says. The total time spent training and a person’s willingness to stick with a workout are also important factors. Yet “per-minute” calorie burn isn’t always the best way to assess a workout’s energy demands, Porcari says. For example, some people in his Tabata study burned up to 360 calories during the 20-minute workout, or 18 calories per minute. “But there’s such a variety within these classes and the people doing them that scores are all over the map,” says John Porcari, author of the Tabata study and a professor of exercise and sports science at the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse. These per-minute calorie averages beat out many traditional forms of exercise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |